donald trump mocks disabled reporter video

None of the media's other hysterical anti-Trump campaigns are getting any traction. Why did the Post instantly remove those videos from the 'Comments' section? To hide the evidence of its lying. The Post deleted the comment - and pronto! In the 'Comments' section to a Washington Post article pushing this lie, someone posted a perfectly respectful response that included the Catholics 4 Trump videos - of Trump doing the exact same imitation of a general and of Serge being interviewed. We also have proof that the media know they are lying about Trump mocking a disabled man. In fact, his disability is almost the exact opposite of what Trump was doing: Serge has arthrogryposis, which locks his wrists in place, actually preventing movement. The only reason you will never see anything but a still photo of Serge is so that the media can trick the public into believing he has something like cerebral palsy. The absence of a current Serge interview is the dog that didn't bark. There's an old interview with Serge here: /wapo-fact-checker-gets-4-hillarys-for-ignoring-evidence-trump-didnt-mock-reporters-disability. That's Debbie Wasserman Schultz you're thinking of. He does not twitch, jerk or flail his arms. The reason the media won't show an interview with Serge is that if you ever saw him speaking, it would be blindingly obvious that Trump's imitation isn't in the same universe as Serge's affliction. Why don't they show us Serge, so that the public can gasp in horror and say, Why Trump's imitation is the spitting image of Serge Kovaleski! That is proof that the media knew they were lying.Īnd isn't it curious that in the midst of the frenzy over Trump's allegedly mocking a disabled reporter, you've never seen the reporter interviewed? But they never allowed the public to see the clip of Trump doing the same imitation of a general. The media knew damn well that Trump does the arm-waving routine whenever he's pretending to be a flustered person.

They saw him do the identical imitation of a general during that same speech. Now consider the media's role in manufacturing, and then protecting, this lie. Perhaps Trump is not a subtle actor, but he's utterly innocent of making fun of a disabled person. He's like Rich Little that way: All his impressions look the same. Trump's impression of a groveling reporter is just like his imitation of a groveling general and just like his imitation of a groveling U.S. If a jury ever saw these videos, it would acquit Trump immediately. Neither the general nor Cruz is disabled. You can see the videos here: /the-true-story-donald-trump-did-not-mock-a-reporters-disability Again, he does the exact same arm flailing. In another speech, Trump pretended to be a timorous Ted Cruz. Guess what? He does the exact same arm flailing. Now we have it.Ī group called Catholics 4 Trump has posted a video clip of another part of that same speech, in which Trump imitates a flustered general. It was perfectly obvious that Trump was not mimicking any disability that Serge has, but I didn't have the smoking gun to prove that the media were lying and knew they were lying. Other than the subject of that paragraph - which I slyly switched from Trump to the media - that is an exact paraphrase of the Post's opening lines from an editorial hawking the media's most successful lie about Donald Trump: that he mocked a man for being disabled. Then - and this is the least surprising part of the story - Post lied about it. The Washington Post's latest ugliness was to exploit the disability of a newspaper reporter in order to smear the Republican nominee for president. Just when you think the media could not possibly become more loathsome, the Fourth Estate bullies prove you wrong again.

Donald trump mocks disabled reporter video